> Clay repeatedly pointed out that other people have objected to ipaddr and > been ignored. It's really, really disappointing to see you continue to > ignore not only them, but the repeated attempts Clay has made to point > them out.
[I meant to stop discussing here, but I just want comment on this remark] I had seen objections from Victor Stinner, which I did not fully understand, but he seemed to be saying that he is ok with including ipaddr. I had also seen objections from David Moss, which he then seems to have withdrawn. I did not take your message (msg78675 in the tracker) as an objection - you just seemed to express a preference to use netaddr instead. You said it had minor quirks, and some of them have to be removed - but I would not infer that the library should be exclude because of these minor quirks. > I don't have time to argue this issue, but I agree with essentially > everything Clay has said in this thread, and I commented about these > problems on the ticket months ago, before ipaddr was added. I now understand (but honestly didn't understand before) that you are objecting to ipaddr's inclusion, and that you would prefer its removal at this point. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
