On Jun 26, 2009, at 8:49 AM, benjamin.peterson wrote:

Author: benjamin.peterson
Date: Fri Jun 26 14:48:55 2009
New Revision: 73569

Log:
update release candidate shorthand

Modified:
  peps/trunk/pep-0101.txt

Modified: peps/trunk/pep-0101.txt
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
======================================================================
--- peps/trunk/pep-0101.txt     (original)
+++ peps/trunk/pep-0101.txt     Fri Jun 26 14:48:55 2009
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@

We use the following conventions in the examples below. Where a release number is given, it is of the form X.YaZ, e.g. 2.6a3 for Python 2.6 alpha
-    3, where "a" == alpha, "b" == beta, "c" == release candidate.
+    3, where "a" == alpha, "b" == beta, "rc" == release candidate.

Final releases are named "releaseXY". The branch tag is "releaseXY-maint" because this will point to the long lived maintenance branch. The fork

I'm sure this has been discussed but I missed it. Why was this change made? If nothing else, it breaks many years of tradition.

-Barry

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to