2009/7/15 Brett Cannon <br...@python.org>: > I implemented get_filename() as specified in PEP 302 for importlib's source > and bytecode loaders and I was starting to create the ABC for importlib.abc, > but then I realized that perhaps the loader should live in runpy instead of > importlib. > Putting the new ABC in importlib keeps all PEP 302 ABCs in a single spot. > But this addition to the PEP 302 protocols is very specific to runpy and is > not directly required to make imports work (the implementation was just a > reshuffling of pre-existing code from one method to another). I am tempted > to leave the ABC out of importlib and stop at implementing get_filename() > for importlib.abc.PyLoader and PyPycLoader. > Any opinions?
importlib. In my view, all of the interfaces defined by PEP 302 should be available from one place. And importlib is that place. Paul. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
