Antoine Pitrou <solipsis <at> pitrou.net> writes:
>
> In any case, you seem to be right on this particular point: the PyGC_Head
> union
> should probably contain a "double" alternative in addition to the "long
> double"
> (and perhaps even a "long long" one).
Sorry, I realize that this doesn't really address the point.
In addition to that union, we should also have a particular mechanism to compute
what the proper offset should be between the PyGC_Head and the PyObject.
Probably something like:
typedef struct {
PyGC_Head head;
union {
/* ... similar union as in PyGC_head */
} body;
} _PyGC_dummy;
#define _PyGC_Head_OFFSET offsetof(_PyGC_dummy, body)
#define _Py_AS_GC(o) ((PyGC_Head *) ((void *)(o) - _PyGC_Head_OFFSET))
Regards
Antoine.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
