2009/7/27 Eric Pruitt <eric.pru...@gmail.com>: > I am implementing the file wrapper using changes to subprocess.Popen that > also make it asynchronous and non-blocking so implementing "r+" should be > trivial to do. How about handling stderr? I have the following ideas: leave > out support for reading from stderr, make it so that there is an optional > additional argument like "outputstderr = False", create another function > that toggles / sets whether stderr or stdout is returned or mix the two > outputs.
I like MRAB's idea of using a (non-standard) "e" flag to include stderr. So "r" reads from stdout, "re" reads from stdout+stderr. Anything more complicated probably should just use "raw" Popen objects. Don't overcomplicate the interface. Paul. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
