On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:16, Mark Hammond<skippy.hamm...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm resurrecting my patch to support a filter called 'none' (which is > turning out to be harder than I thought). Off the top of my head, it would > the following would give us a pretty solid solution: > > * Finish my patch for 'none' as a filter, so '**=cleverencode' can be > reasonably used (currently you can't specify specific files *not* have > cleverencode, making it unsuitable in practice without the concept of > 'none') > > * Add support for versioned 'filter rules' - eg, /.hgfilters or similar. > > * This might be pushing my luck, but: add 'defensive' support to core hg for > this feature - if /.hgfilters exists, hg should refuse to operate on the > working tree unless the win32text extension is enabled.
Sounds great to me. The latter might indeed be hard to get into the core, but seems like a good idea to try. Cheers, Dirkjan _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
