Antoine Pitrou wrote:
DrKJam <drkjam <at> gmail.com> writes:
netaddr employs a simple variant of the GoF Strategy design pattern (with
added Python sensibility).
It would be nice if you could avoid employing this kind of acronyms without
explaining them. Not everybody drinks the design pattern kool-aid.
(Google tells me that GoF seems to mean "Gang of Four", which is of course as
meaningful as a hip-hop band name can be :-))
Really? Discussing the GoF design patterns by name seems to be prevalent
amongst the programmers I know (yourself excluded of course...).
Michael
In any case, if you think netaddr's implementation strategy is better than
ipaddr's, a detailed comparison would be welcome.
Regards
Antoine.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
