On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:06, Cameron Simpson <c...@zip.com.au> wrote:
> On 25Jul2009 10:25, Gregory P. Smith <g...@krypto.org> wrote: > | On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Thomas Wouters<tho...@python.org> > wrote: > | > So attached (and at http://codereview.appspot.com/96125/show ) is a > | > preliminary fix, correcting the problem with os.fork(), os.forkpty() > and > | > os.fork1(). This doesn't expose a general API for C code to use, for > two > | > reasons: it's not easy, and I need this fix more than I need the API > change > | > :-) (I actually need this fix myself for Python 2.4, but it applies > fairly > | > cleanly.) > | > | This looks good to me. > [...] > > Where's this stand with respect to the upcoming Python 2.6.3? Unless anyone speaks up, I'll submit the fix (without the change in semantics on AIX) to release26-maint early next week, so it would be in 2.6.3. -- Thomas Wouters <tho...@python.org> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
