On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > Peter Moody <peter <at> hda3.com> writes: >> >> Again, the same error-catching functionality can be obtained through >> an option to the constructor. network and broadcast attributes can be >> renamed to .\1_address to alleviate confusion as well. > > My remark was not targetting error-catching of non-zero low bits, it was about > the suggestion to have a "network" or "mask" attribute on Address objects.
If I'm reading your reply correctly, then I agree that having a network attribute on an address object doesn't make sense. My remark was targeting Eric's reply of, "By keeping the concepts distinct we can catch mis-uses earlier." Cheers, /peter > Regards > > Antoine. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-dev%40hda3.com > _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
