I again invite interested parties to continue this discussion on
ipaddr-py-...@googlegroups.com. we're pushing 250 messages on PEP
3144 at this point; well beyond what most folks would call a "long
open-ended discussion".
anyway:
> The current behaviour is confusing to me. For example:
>
>>>> netw1 = ipaddr.IPv4Network('192.168.1.1/24')
>>>> netw2 = ipaddr.IPv4Network('192.168.1.0/24')
>>>> netw1 == netw2
> False
>>>> list(netw1) == list(netw2)
> True
I think you're intentionally confusing yourself here. 192.168.1.1
clearly doesn't equal 192.168.1.0, so I don't know why you'd expect
192.168.1.1/24 to equal 192.168.1.0/24.
> Two networks, containing exactly the same range of addresses, but they
> don't compare equal. I'm not convinced that netw1 should even be
> allowed, but if it is, surely it should be turned into canonical form
> netw2? E.g. I would expect this:
>
>>>> ipaddr.IPv4Network('192.168.1.1/24')
> IPv4Network('192.168.1.0/24')
>
> but that's not what it does.
now you're confusing me as before you've asked for this to either:
1. Raise an exception
2. Return two objects.
your unconfusing (to you) example does neither one of those.
> --
> Steven D'Aprano
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-dev%40hda3.com
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
