On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:35 AM, R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com>wrote:
> A little googling produced this hit: > > > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/mip4/draft-ietf-mip4-nemo-v4-base/draft-ietf-mip4-nemo-v4-base-11-from-10.diff.txt > > which while not a standard itself clearly believes that non-contiguous > netmasks are valid, and is dated 2008. Earlier RFCs (950 and 1219) > give them as valid but discouraged. > That's a draft for RFC 5177. In the RFC, all references to non-contiguous subnets have been removed. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5177 -- Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D. President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LLC <http://stutzbachenterprises.com>
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
