Yuvgoog Greenle wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: >> Is there any point? Even if accepted, it's too late to make it into 3.1, >> and with the overwhelming approval for a moratorium on changes to >> built-ins, it is likely to just sit in the tracker, forgotten, until >> 2013 or later. How likely is it that the patch will still be >> applicable? > > > +1 on throwing it away completely even if it's a good idea. I suggest > Willi go invent a new language (and hope for it to become popular :-) > if he wants to experiment.
Careful folks - these kinds of throwaway comments may be clearly tongue in cheek for anyone following the moratorium discussion on python-ideas, but will be justifiably confusing to anyone else, especially newcomers. Willi - Oleg is right that patches should go on the issue tracker. They tend to get lost if they only exist on the mailing list. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
