On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > > Hello again, > > Brett Cannon <brett <at> python.org> writes: >> >> I think it's worth it. Removal of the GIL is a totally open-ended problem >> with no solution in sight. This, on the other hand, is a performance benefit >> now. I say move forward with this. If it happens to be short-lived because >> some actually figures out how to remove the GIL then great, but is that >> really going to happen between now and Python 3.2? I doubt it. > > Based on this whole discussion, I think I am going to merge the new GIL work > into the py3k branch, with priority requests disabled. > > If you think this is premature or uncalled for, or if you just want to review > the changes before making a judgement, please voice up :)
+1 Good idea. Thats the best way to make sure this work gets anywhere. It can be iterated on from there if anyone has objections. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
