Sturla Molden wrote: > Martin v. Löwis skrev: >> b) notice that, on Windows, minimum wait resolution may be as large as >> 15ms (e.g. on XP, depending on the hardware). Not sure what this >> means for WaitForMultipleObjects; most likely, if you ask for a 5ms >> wait, it waits until the next clock tick. It would be bad if, on >> some systems, a wait of 5ms would mean that it immediately returns. >> > Which is why one should use multimedia timers with QPC on Windows.
Maybe you should study the code under discussion before making such a proposal. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
