On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > Willem, the rationale for this PEP is to give alternative > implementations the chance to catch up with CPython. > > Given your statement that CLPython is quite complete on the language > level, but missing standard library features, how do you think the > moratorium will help CLPython?
It would be great to have a pause in Python-the-language, so that CLPython might at the end of the moratorium finally be up to date with the latest 2.x and 3.x features. Supporting standard libraries is a bigger challenge, as the ones written in C need rewriting. Whether or not there is a pause on that front does not matter too much to that situation. - Willem _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
