On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 14:52, Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> wrote: >> And they do: nan != 0 returns False. Maybe I'm missing your point >> here? > > Aargh! True! I meant to say True!
Huh. Somewhere along the line I lost track of how python handled NaN. I thought "comparisons always evaluate to false" was the rule. -- Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
