David Lyon wrote: > On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:31:09 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull" > <step...@xemacs.org> wrote: > >> Martin's point is that the PEP process doesn't *have* "reference" >> implementations. It has *sample* implementations. It may be useful >> to refer to a sample implementation as an example.. > > Fair enough. But otoh, asking for sample implementations on this > type of project can skew the PEP towards a particular implementation > or product.
Nobody is "asking" for sample implementations. Instead, I'm asking that what Tarek calls a "reference implementation" should be called a "sample implementation" instead. I'm asking for that precisely to avoid a skew towards a particular implementation. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
