On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Lennart Regebro <rege...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:02, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.ta...@gmail.com> wrote: >> -1. This looks like typos the developer made on his versions definitions. > > Nah. > >> And if not, is subject to errors by forgetting dashes or dots. > > Eh, yeah but that goes for ANY syntax. > > Having the same syntax as for package specifications does make sense, though. > (So we should clearly change that one too, eh?)
I don't think we need to change the syntax in fact. The current one, with simple operators covers the needs as far as I see. What was fuzzy is the meaning of version strings like "2.5". Once it's clarified (and it seems we have a better definition already since a few mails), I think the current syntax works naturally with ranges. Regards Tarek -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
