2009/12/30 Olemis Lang <ole...@gmail.com>: > Hmmm ... One of the issues I didn't notice ... > > IMO +1 for leaving it as it was before (i.e. __unittest) because : > > - the double underscore should mean (CMIIW) that it's an implementation > detail > - not few libs use that name already ;o) > > +0.5 for adding `__unittest_ignore_traceback` or something shorter > (e.g. `__unittest_ignore`) too ... > > +1 for documenting that «hack»
Someone should probably file a tracker request about this. -- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
