On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:10, Juan Fernando Herrera J. <juan...@gmail.com>wrote:
> How about a new python 3 release with (possibly partial) backwards > compatibility with 2.6? I'm a big 3 fan, but I'm dismayed at the way major > software hasn't been ported to it. I'm eager to use 3, but paradoxically, > the 3 release makes me rather stuck with 2.6. Excuse me if this has been > suggested in the past. > > The proper route to take, in my opinion, is to see what 2.x libraries you are using that are not 3.x compatible, run 2to3 on them, then run their test suite, and see where you get. Submit a patch or two to the library and see what happens -- it at least gets the wheels in motion. I'm sure everyone out there would like to dive into supporting 3.x, but it's tough to prioritize when you are up to your eyeballs with 2.x bugs in your tracker. Look at Twisted ( http://stackoverflow.com/questions/172306/how-are-you-planning-on-handling-the-migration-to-python-3) -- over 1000 issues, ~5 developers -- 3.x support won't be here tomorrow, but it's on the horizon.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
