Le samedi 09 janvier 2010 12:18:33, Walter Dörwald a écrit : > > Good idea, I choosed open(filename, encoding="BOM"). > > On the surface this looks like there's an encoding named "BOM", but > looking at your patch I found that the check is still done in > TextIOWrapper. IMHO the best approach would to the implement a *real* > codec named "BOM" (or "sniff"). This doesn't require *any* changes to > the IO library. It could even be developed as a standalone project and > published in the Cheeseshop.
Why not, this is another solution to the point (2) (Check for a BOM while reading or detect it before?). Which encoding would be used if there is not BOM? UTF-8 sounds like a good choice. -- Victor Stinner http://www.haypocalc.com/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
