Andrew Bennetts <andrew <at> bemusement.org> writes: > > But a hypothetical 2.8 would also give people a way to move closer to > py3k without giving up on using all their 2.x-only dependencies. I > think it's much more likely that libraries like Twisted can support 2.8 > in the near future than 3.x.
I don't think a 2.8 could make you much closer to 3.x. AFAICT, every possible way to ease transition to 3.x will already be in 2.7, or almost. But perhaps I'm lacking imagination. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
