2010/1/11 Jack Diederich <jackd...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: >> As an example, the one library I've already ported used a metaclass. I don't >> see any way to specify that the metaclass should be used in a portable way. >> In Python 2.6 it's: >> >> class Foo: >> __metaclass__ = Meta >> >> and in Python 3 it's: >> >> class Foo(metaclass=Meta): >> >> 2to3 made that pain go away. > > [sidebar] > 1) the metaclass fixer was a PITA to implement.
Does this make it any less useful, though? :) -- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
