Paul Moore wrote: > 2010/1/14 Vinay Sajip <vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk>: >> So, can you please indicate your vote for or against incorporating PEP 391 >> into Python? > > I've no immediate need for the feature, but it would be good to have > something like this, so I'm +1.
I'm in the same boat as Paul, but PEP 291 provides a nice forward compatible configuration scheme that will work with any application configuration approach that can produce an appropriate Python dictionary. So +1 from me too - I think the PEP has now taken this as far as theorising can go, and the only way to learn anything further is to put it into practice. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
