Tres Seaver <tseaver <at> palladion.com> writes: > > Note that the "we" in your sentence is not anything like the "quod > semper quod ubique quod ab omnibus" criterion for accepting dogma: > mutliprocessing is a tool, and needs to be used according to its nature, > just as with threading.
I don't remember enough latin to understand what it means :-S The word "dogma" is a good one in this context however. "We" ( ;-)) have accepted and promoted the dogma that multiprocessing is the solution to parallelism in the face of the GIL. While it needn't be applicable in any and every situation, we should make it so that it is applicable often enough. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
