On 2/3/2010 12:35 PM, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
Hi Barry,
Thanks for doing the work of writing a PEP. The rational section
could use some strengthing, I think. Who is benefiting from this
feature?
The original proposal of changing .pyc to a directory would be negative
to me so I would not use the option. I am pretty sure that I would
consider the alternate proposal of one cache subdirectory per source
directory to be a plus for me. Giving that I only put .py files in a
directory, the directory listing (skipping subdirs which Windows sorts
at the top) would then be a listing of my .py files without the noise of
duplicates. Finding files in /Lib for source viewing would also be much
easier. No noise, and twice as much real info on the screen at once.
I am assuming that having two directories open, each have as large,
would have negligable time and space impact.
Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
