On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Olemis Lang <ole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Michael Foord
> <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Several
>> authors of other Python testing frameworks spoke up *against* them, but
>> several *users* of test frameworks spoke up in favour of them. ;-)
>>
>
> +1 for having something like that included in unittest
>
>> I'm pretty sure I can introduce setUpClass and setUpModule without breaking
>> compatibility with existing unittest extensions or backwards compatibility
>> issues
>
> Is it possible to use the names `BeforeClass` and `AfterClass` (just
> to be make it look similar to JUnit naming conventions ;o) ?
>
Another Q:
- class setup method will be a `classmethod` isn't it ? It should not be
a regular instance method because IMO it is not bound to a particular
`TestCase` instance.
--
Regards,
Olemis.
Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/
Featured article:
Embedding pages? - Trac Users | Google Groups -
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TracGViz-full/~3/-XtS7h-wjcI/e4cf16474aa3cb87
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
