2010/2/12 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com>:
> Brett Cannon wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:17, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote:
>>> IMO, it is realistic to predict that this will not actually happen. If
>>> we can agree to give up the 2to3 sandbox, we should incorporate
>>> find_pattern into the tree, and perhaps test.py as well.
>> I vote on giving up the 2to3 sandbox.
> Besides, if we're using hg, it should make it much easier for someone
> else to branch that part of the stdlib and create a standalone 2to3
> release from it if they really want to.

I personally like 2to3 in a separate repo because it fits well with my
view that 2to3 is an extra application that happens to also be
distributed with python.

Python-Dev mailing list

Reply via email to