--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com
On 28 Feb 2010, at 12:19, Floris Bruynooghe
<floris.bruynoo...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 02:51:16PM +1300, Greg Ewing wrote:
Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
(But even then I'm not
convinced that would double the stat calls for normal users, only
for
those who only ship .pyc files)
It would increase the number of stat calls for normal
users by 50%. You would need to look for a .pyc in the
source directory, then .py in the source directory and
.pyc in the cache directory. That's compared to two
stat calls currently, for .py and .pyc.
Can't it look for a .py file in the source directory first (1st stat)?
When it's there check for the .pyc in the cache directory (2nd stat,
magic number encoded in filename), if it's not check for .pyc in the
source directory (2nd stat + read for magic number check). Or am I
missing a subtlety?
The problem is doing this little dance for every path on sys.path.
Michael
A solution might be to look for the presence of the
cache directory, and only look for a .pyc in the source
directory if there is no cache directory. Testing for
the cache directory would only have to be done once
per package and the result remembered, so it would
add very little overhead.
That would work too, but I don't understand yet why the .pyc check in
the source directory can't be done last.
Regards
Floris
--
Debian GNU/Linux -- The Power of Freedom
www.debian.org | www.gnu.org | www.kernel.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
