Henning von Bargen wrote: > If the ZIP contains only bytecode files, it is just not intended > for changing any code, so I don't think this is an argument. > If you have access to the source code, you still can use that instead > of messing around with byte code.
That doesn't apply when it is the app developer trying to figure out why their app is breaking when they throw it in a bytecode only zip :) It's a moot point anyway - Guido has pronounced that the bytecode-only support will be left alone by PEP 3147 even if the other caching changes are eventually accepted. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
