Le Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:59:50 +0000, Jon Ribbens <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Sorry if I missed it, but why on earth is the bytecode directory > __pycache__ and not .pycache? (Or indeed anything else that starts > with a '.') Surely this is a classic ideal use case for a "hidden" > directory?
I suppose the same reason pyc files are not hidden nowadays. We want people to be aware that these files exist. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
