On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > Which I still have to review. (Mark, if you're there, could you make a > brief post here on the mathematical definition of the new hash you're > proposing, and why it is both efficient to compute and good (enough) > as a hash function?)
Never mind, Mark. I found your explanation here: http://codereview.appspot.com/660042/diff/19001/11009?column_width=80 -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
