On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
<alexander.belopol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ..
>> There's no ideal solution here; IMO, the compromise that currently
>> exists is an acceptable one.
>
> I don't see a compromise. So far I failed to find a use case that
> benefits from NaN violating reflexivity.
>
So if I understand correctly, you propose that float('nan') ==
float('nan') return True. Would you also suggest extending this
behaviour to Decimal nans?
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
