Greg Ewing <greg.ewing <at> canterbury.ac.nz> writes: > > Maybe it would be better to deprecate globals() and locals() > and replace them with another function called something like > scope().
It is useful to distinguish between globals (i.e., module-level variables) and locals, so replacing them with scope() would not be better IMO. > It would return a mapping object that looks up > names in the current scope. It could also improve on locals() > by being writable. If you can prove that making locals() (or its replacement) writable doesn't complicate the interpreter core too much, then why not. Otherwise -1 :-) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
