On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > I see the confusion. I think Martin meant more about open issues that > required discussion, not simply issues that had a patch ready to go.
Ach. I hit 'send' too soon. I also wanted to say: it seemed quite clear to me that Martin specifically meant "simply issues that had a patch ready to go". Quoting him exactly: >> Please understand that setting the state of an issue to "review" may *not* >> be the best way to trigger a review - it may be more effective to post to >> python-dev if you truly believe that the patch can be committed as-is. It seems that perhaps the core developers have slightly different opinions about this? :)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
