On 5/11/2010 11:54 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > I know for functions "==" and "is" currently are equivalent, but we should be > really finicky here about intent, especially since a few messages in the > thread is contemplate testing function for equivalence to one degree or > other. At which point "==" and "is" aren't the same any more. >
As I stated above, I make no effort to address equivalence of the functions, nor of the arguments. I am addressing identity of the partial object, which I am defining as identity of the functions + identity of the args + equivalence of the keyword arguments after a deterministic process has been applied. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
