On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyass...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 6:39 AM, James Y Knight <f...@fuhm.net> wrote: >> I think you'll be a lot happier just modifying Psyco than making everyone >> else in the world change their compiler flags. > > Aye, there's the rub. Nobody's happier modifying Psyco. :) But that > just means people will gradually have to stop using psyco in favor of > maintainable JITs. Gcc's not going to change its stack requirements > just because some people think they know what the ABI should be better > than the people defining the ABI. Btw, this has been a problem since > at least gcc-4.4.
Heh. psyco already does it for Mac OS X (which defines 16 byte stack alignment as ABI), so should be super trivial. Good rant Jeffrey though. Cheers, fijal _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com