On May 26, 2010, at 4:55 AM, Brian Quinlan wrote:

> I said exactly the opposite of what I meant: futures don't need a reference 
> to the invoker.

Indeed they don't, and they really shouldn't have one.  If I wrote that they 
did, then it was an error.

... and that appears to be it!  Thank you for your very gracious handling of a 
pretty huge pile of criticism :).

Good luck with the PEP,

-glyph

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to