On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:35:12PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:30:22 -0400 > Toshio Kuratomi <a.bad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Note that this assumption seems optimistic to me. I started talking to > > Graham > > Dumpleton, author of mod_wsgi a couple years back because mod_wsgi and paste > > do decoding of bytes to unicode at different layers which caused problems > > for application level code that should otherwise run fine when being served > > by mod_wsgi or paste httpserver. That was the beginning of Graham starting > > to talk about what the wsgi spec really should look like under python3 > > instead of the broken way that the appendix to the current wsgi spec states. > > Ok, but the reason would be that the WSGI spec is broken. Not Python 3 > itself. > Agreed. Neither python2 nor python3 is broken. It's the wsgi spec and the implementation of that spec where things fall down. From your first post, I thought you were claiming that python3 was broken since web frameworks got decoding right on python2 and I just wanted to defend python3 by showing that python2 wasn't all sunshine and roses.
-Toshio
pgp8xQXfAPrYT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
