On Jun 24, 2010, at 01:00 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: >2010/6/24 Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org>: >> On Jun 24, 2010, at 10:58 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: >> >>>2010/6/24 Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org>: >>>> Please let me know what you think. I'm happy to just commit this to the >>>> py3k branch if there are no objections <wink>. I don't think a new PEP is >>>> in order, but an update to PEP 3147 might make sense. >>> >>>How will this interact with PEP 384 if that is implemented? >> I'm trying to come up with something that will work immediately while PEP 384 >> is being adopted. > >But how will modules specify that they support multiple ABIs then?
I didn't understand, so asked Benjamin for clarification in IRC.
<gutworth> barry: if python 3.3 will only load x.3.3.so, but x.3.2.so supports
the stable abi, will it load it? [14:25]
<barry> gutworth: thanks, now i get it :) [14:26]
<barry> gutworth: i think it should, but it wouldn't under my scheme. let me
think about it
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
