On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:55:26 +0530, Senthil Kumaran <orsent...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:28:45PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote: > > Thinking way outside the square, and probably the pale > > as well, maybe @ could be pressed into service as an > > infix operator, with > > > > s...@i > > > > being equivalent to > > > > s[i:i+1] > > > > And this is way beyond being intuitive.
Agreed, -1 on that. Like I said, I was just venting. The decision to have indexing bytes return an int is set in stone now and I just have to live with it. -- R. David Murray www.bitdance.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
