On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: [snip] > Great points Jesse! Since I really don't have the time or expertise to > make a judgment on this PEP, I hereby appoint you chair of the > approval process for this PEP. That basically means that when you > think it's ready to be approved, you say so, and it's a done deal. The > remaining feedback cycle is up to you now -- it sounds like you're > ready for closure, which sounds good to me (again, without having read > the PEP or tried to write something using the proposed code). You can > do it however you like: you can declare it approved now, or read it > over once more yourself and suggest some final changes, or set a > period (e.g. 48 hours) during which final comments have to be > received, which you then will judge by merit or by your whim, or you > can flip a coin or say a prayer... (I've tried most of those myself in > the past and haven't done too badly if I say so myself. :-) You're the > boss now. I know you will do the right thing for this PEP. > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) >
So, after some cool down - and the last rounds of discussion which triggered some jiggery-pokery on Brian's part, I'm accepting PEP 3148 "futures - execute computations asynchronously". I feel that it's a good addition, and a good start for something bigger down the road. Brian - you'll need to provide someone such as Martin or Georg your public key for ssh access into SVN, and you'll need developer access to the bug tracker. jesse _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
