On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net> wrote: > Sure -- I don't think this is a showstopper for regex. However if we don't > include regex in a future version, we might think about increasing MAXCACHE > a bit, and maybe not clear the cache when it reaches its max length, but > rather remove another element.
Yikes, I didn't know it did that. That certainly sounds like it should be an RFE in its own right - some basic form of Least Recently Used accounting should be beneficial (although the extra bookkeeping might hurt scripts that aren't hitting the cache limit). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
