On Jul 23, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: >> I'd be open to adding the >> platform name to the tag, but I'd probably define it as part of the >> implementation field, e.g. foo.cpython-linux2-32m.so. Or maybe >> start with the platform name, e.g. foo.linux2-cpython-32m. This >> isn't a strong preference though. > >I don't have a strong opionion, but placing the platform name at the >start is probably better to be consistent with >sysconfig.get_platform().
What about the architecture (i386, amd64)? With every increase in length I start to get more concerned. We could encode the platform and architecture, but that gets into cryptic territory. OTOH, would you really co-install i386 and amd64 shared libraries on the same machine? (hello NFS ;). -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
