2010/7/23 stefan brunthaler <ste...@brunthaler.net> > > This sounds like wpython (a CPython derivative with a wider set of byte > code > > commands) could benefit from it. > > > I am aware of the wpython project of Cesare di Mauro.
wpython has reached 1.1 final version. If you are interested, you can find it here: http://code.google.com/p/wpython2/ and you can download the new slides that cover the improvements over 1.0 alpha. > I change the > instruction format from bytecode to wordcode, too (because it allows > for more efficient instruction decoding). Did you used wpython wordcode format, or a new one? > Contrary to his approach, > however, I do not change the instruction encoding to pack in > additional optimizations. (I hope to have put that correctly; I have > seen his slides about a year ago.) > Yes, you're right. wpython approach is to encode as much information as it can to save space, decoding time, "specialize" some opcodes, etc.. Cesare
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
