On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 04:27:53 am Terry Reedy wrote: > On 8/2/2010 12:54 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:39, Ralf Schmitt <r...@brainbot.com > > <mailto:r...@brainbot.com>> wrote: > > > > Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org > > <mailto:benja...@python.org>> > > > > writes: > > > Please, let's stop messing with the tracker for everything. > > > I think the current set up works reasonably well, and we > > > should focus on the real problem: manpower > > Two months ago, I discovered and reported that about 1/5 of open > issues had no responses. Is that 'reasonably well'?
I don't know. What percentage of new issues get ever get a response? My wild guess is that it's probably about 99.9%, but the 0.1% that don't remain languishing forever, skewing the statistics. What's the average age of those 1 in 5 issues? Maybe 1 in 5 is exactly right, given the realities of people available to respond to issues versus people available to report issues. Maybe 1 in 5 is supernaturally good, given our resources available. -- Steven D'Aprano _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
