On 7 Aug, 2010, at 10:24, Hirokazu Yamamoto wrote:
> This is the idea just popped up. :-)
>
> #define SIG(name) if (sig_num != SIG##name)
> SIG(ABRT) SIG(FPE) SIG(ILL) SIG(INT) SIG(SEGV) SIG(TERM) {
> PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError, "signal number out of range");
> return NULL;
> }
> #undef SIG
What's wrong with:
switch (sig_num) {
case SIGABRT:
case SIGFPE:
...
case SIGTERM:
break;
default:
PyErr_SetString(...)
return NULL;
}
That would IMO be clearer than the macro you propose.
Ronald
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ronaldoussoren%40mac.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
