On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:28:18 +0300, Ezio Melotti <ezio.melo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > lately I've been working on the new summary of Python tracker issues. > This is the result.
Thanks for working on this, Ezio! > > Issues stats: > > open 2640 (+35) > > closed 18679 (+194) > > total 21319 (+57) > > The +35 means that there are 35 more issues opened since the last week. > This is not the number of issues that have been created during the last > week, but the number of new issues that have been created or reopened > that are still open. Also note that 'pending' and 'languishing' are > considered as 'open' too. How about changing the label to 'not closed' to make that clear? > > Issues opened (35) > > ================== > > > > #8821: Range check on unicode repr > > http://bugs.python.org/issue8821 reopened by pitrou > > [...] > > This is the list of *all* the issues created or reopened during the last > week *that are still open*. I wonder if it would be useful to split this into two tables, one for new issues still open and one for reopened issues. I think the mental space in which one considers re-opened issues is different from the one for new issues. In particular, a developer who doesn't have time to scan the new issues might notice a reopened issue they were involved in but haven't yet looked at their 'nosy' email about. Perhaps not worth the effort, it's just a thought. > > Recent issues with no replies (15) > > ================================== > > > > #9535: Pending signals are inherited by child processes > > http://bugs.python.org/issue9535 > > [...] > > This is the list of the open issues with only 1 message, sorted by > creation date. > The list is limited to max 15 issues but is not limited to the last > week. This means that issues older than a week are included here if less > than 15 issues with only 1 message have been created this week. > > > Issues waiting for review (15) > > ============================== > > > > #1474680: pickling files works with protocol=2. > > http://bugs.python.org/issue1474680 > > [...] > > This is the list of issues with 'patch' or 'needs review' keywords or > 'patch review' stage that have been active during the last week. > The list is limited to max 15 issues. For both of these I think it is important that the fact that they are limited to 15 be mentioned in the section header. The issues needing review is a great addition, probably every bit as valuable as the no replies report. I hope that it, too, will draw on the previous weeks if there are less than fifteen that were active in the current week? > > Top issues most discussed (10) > > ============================== > > > > #9079: Make gettimeofday available in time module > > http://bugs.python.org/issue9079 42 msgs > > [...] > > This is the list of issues with activity in the last week sorted by > number of message. > This list is limited to max 10 issues. I've already talked with Ezio in IRC about the fact that this list represents a regression from the old report, since the old report gave the issues with the most messages *during the week* whereas his current looks at the *total* message count for any issue that has had *any* activity during the current week. He's going to fix that. > > Issues closed (154) > > =================== > > > > #1474680: pickling files works with protocol=2. > > http://bugs.python.org/issue1474680 closed by alexandre.vassalotti > > [...] > > This is the list of *all* the issues closed in the last week *that are > still closed*. > Since this list might be quite long I put it at the end, to make it > easier to reach the other lists. It would be lovely if we could manage to get this one to be the longest table in the report each week :) -- R. David Murray www.bitdance.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com