On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyass...@gmail.com> wrote: > Decimal may actually have this backwards. The idea would be that > min(*lst) == sorted(lst)[0], and max(*lst) == sorted(lst)[-1]. Given a > stable sort, then, max of equivalent elements would return the last > element, and min the first.
Yes, you're right; that would make more sense than the other way around. Mark _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
