> > I mostly use the dis module for quick-n-dirty exploration of the results > of > > compilation into bytecode, and I'm sure many people use for the same > effect. > > Thus show_code seems like a convenient shortcut, although not a necessary > > one. The string returned by code_info isn't interactive-shell friendly, > and > > show_code saves the print(...). > > > > Personally I think that if it's there, it should be documented. If it's > > better not to use it, it should be removed or at least marked deprecated > in > > the documentation/docstring. > > Yeah, I changed my mind and have now documented it properly. The 3.2 > versionadded tag on show_code is currently a little questionable > though. Guido actually checked in the original (undocumented) version > of show_code before 3.0 was released. The only thing new about it in > 3.2 is it being mentioned in the documentation. >
Looks good to me. Eli
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
